Thanks, for the feedback. It would be nice if the Valetpark application didn't have that limitation. The park to a specific park number is a nice feature.
-----Original Message----- From: Paul Zimm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 11:40 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SuperValetParkCall Application Unable to Re-ParkCall Kevin wrote: >After retrieving a SuperValetParkCall using the SuperValetUnparkCall >command, I am unable to re- SuperValetParkCall the call again. Can >anyone confirm if this is a bug or my configs may be incorrect. > >Configs: > > >exten => >3XXXX,1,SuperValetParkcall(${EXTEN:1}|mylot|500|${EXTEN:1}|1|local) >exten => _3XXXX,2,Hangup >exten => _*3XXXX,1,SuperValetUnParkCall(${EXTEN:2}|mylot) >exten => _*3XXXX,2,Hangup > > This is not a bug. I experienced the same problem, and took a peek at the code. Apparently app_supervaletparking uses it's own channel bridge function, which is very basic and doesn't process the # transfer command. I need the ability to transfer a call after a SuperValetUnparkCall so I went back to using app_valetparking. I wasn't using the "new" features in app_supervaletparking, just the park and unpark functions. Marv Horst _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.4 - Release Date: 12/22/2004 _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
