On December 23, 2004 02:31 pm, Steven Critchfield wrote: > > While I agree, I also must point out > > - TDM400P - this card seems to be the #1 source of problems. I believe > > the FXO module issues are solved but the FXS issues are still around. > > Hopefully the same fix works.
> I think this is also a case of unprepared users and a not yet polished > product. Only those doing small time to hobby deployments use those > cards. You can't expect them to be as knowledgeable as the people > deploying on PRIs. I think both aspects compound the trouble. Untrue. SOHO deployments would make very good use of this card, but I am speccing out T100Ps and channel banks (and all the costs associated with this setup) because these cards are not stable (yet). Being able to put a pair or even three TDM400Ps would be very beneficial to me, and I'm neither a hobby user nor unknowlegeable about the issues at hand. (At least I don't think I am unknowlegeable, perhaps I am?) > Out of the number of multi hundred deployments I have heard about, I > think the couple you hear here and there are probably statistically > insignificant overall. Doesn't help the specific users who are getting > bit, but overall, I don't see enough to think there is an inherent > problem. I agree -- I must admit I added the IAXy to "pad out" my argument -- my main beef is with the TDM4XXP card/driver. -A. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
