For example, in this case the caller-id (PSTN) was unavailable, so the resulting SIP packet was:
From: "anonymous" <sip:1.2.3.4>;tag=30A
Asterisk reads, and sets and passes this out as a caller-ID of '1234'
I would have thought Asterisk should have noticed that there wasnt a username portion present, and defaulted to its standard 'unknown' setting rather than trying to make something out of the hostname portion.
Any comments?
Linus
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
