Hello Brian ,  Why wouldn't 'make clean' do just that ?
                Tia ,  JimL

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did the trick, Wonderfull!
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West
Sent: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 23:21
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0.2

rm all the .so's and try again.

bkw

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 4:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0.2
Hello
I compiled the new 1.02 over 1.01
My old asterisk 1.01 was compiled (on redhat 9.0) by downloading the
src
tarball from ftp.asterisk.com/pub/asterisk
I did this the exact same way now, downloaded the 1.02 tarball,
unpacked
it, killed all asterisk 1.01 processes, issued a 'make' and 'make
install', which seemed to compile without problems..
When starting the new version, asterisk exited with this error
  == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/features.conf': Found
    -- Registered extension context 'parkedcalls'
    -- Added extension '700' priority 1 to parkedcalls
asterisk: relocation error: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/res_features.so:
undefined symbol: ast_pthread_create
...snip...
--
       +------------------------------------------------------------------+
       | James   W.   Laferriere | System    Techniques | Give me VMS     |
       | Network        Engineer | 3542 Broken Yoke Dr. |  Give me Linux  |
       | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Billings , MT. 59105 |   only  on  AXP |
       +------------------------------------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to