Hello Brian , Why wouldn't 'make clean' do just that ?
Tia , JimLOn Tue, 26 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did the trick, Wonderfull! -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West Sent: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 23:21 To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0.2
rm all the .so's and try again.
bkw
src-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 4:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0.2 Hello I compiled the new 1.02 over 1.01 My old asterisk 1.01 was compiled (on redhat 9.0) by downloading theunpackedtarball from ftp.asterisk.com/pub/asterisk I did this the exact same way now, downloaded the 1.02 tarball,it, killed all asterisk 1.01 processes, issued a 'make' and 'make install', which seemed to compile without problems.. When starting the new version, asterisk exited with this error == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/features.conf': Found -- Registered extension context 'parkedcalls' -- Added extension '700' priority 1 to parkedcalls asterisk: relocation error: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/res_features.so: undefined symbol: ast_pthread_create
...snip...
--
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS |
| Network Engineer | 3542 Broken Yoke Dr. | Give me Linux |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Billings , MT. 59105 | only on AXP |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
