On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 15:03:58 +0200, Rodolfo Grave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but I'm sure with the help of the community and if there > are enough people needing/wating this, we can make a good language > specification. Personally I can and will make the compiler from the > higher level to current language, and even maybe vice-versa. Just need > the specification of both languages and support of the comunity (if no > one needs this it is not worthy).
If you want to build a strong house, you need a solid fundament. I don't think the current configuration language is a good fundament to build upon. We would be well advised to first build that solid fundament before thinking about higher level languages. So how about a discussion to give Asterisk an XML based configuration as a base. For backwards compatibility, the existing config language could then sit on top of the XML as one alternative amongst others. rgds benjk -- Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan. NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists may get trashed. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
