> -----Original Message----- > From: Ryan Parlee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 6:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] CVS version tags > > > > Can someone please tell me which version tags I should be > using when checking out with cvs. Right now I have two > directory trees: > > 1) /u1/src/asterisk/asterisk-stable > > 2) /u1/src/asterisk/asterisk-dev > > #1 has "Tv1-0_stable" in the CVS/Tags file. I haven't used > tags a whole lot, but I'm guessing that I checked this tree > out with "cvs -z9 co -r v1-0_stable asterisk". I just tried > to do "cvs -z9 update -d" and it wouldn't complete. Am I > doing something wrong or is this tag no longer valid? >
I believe that 1-0_stable has been superceded by v1_0_rc_1. If you want to use the latest stable version try: cvs co -r v1_0_rc_1 asterisk > #2 has no CVS/Tags file. When I do "cvs -z9 update -d" > everything works fine. But, isn't this the up-to-the-minute > development version of asterisk? I need to be running > something stable that doesn't crash. > Those commands certainly do download the latest up-to-the-minute Version of asterisk. It is possible that some bugs and whatnot will be found, but I have found that CVS Head is pretty stable. Untill RC1 was released I was using the latest CVS for our main production system. > Thanks for your help! > Glad to be able to help. > -Ryan > Robert Jackson _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
