wondering if anybody knows this......does shady dial work only with a zap interface or can it be configured to be used with SIP or IAX.
Nauman -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 5:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #4448 - 10 msgs Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: VoIP hackers gut Caller ID ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 2. Cisco 7960 NAT question (Ben Merrills) 3. Re: Small Linux Distro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 4. RE: Cisco 7960 NAT question (Hall, Eric M.) 5. Minimum install required for Asterisk + voicemail & SIP friends from mysql (=?iso-8859-1?q?Umar=20Sear?=) 6. Re: ISDN, AVM C4, HFC-cards and echo (Junaid Saeed Uppal) 7. RE: ISDN, AVM C4, HFC-cards and echo (Robinson Tim-W10277) 8. Question about Cisco IP Phone 7960 (Hall, Eric M.) 9. Re: VoIP hackers gut Caller ID (Brian Cuthie) 10. Re: VoIP hackers gut Caller ID (Stuart Baggs) --__--__-- Message: 1 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP hackers gut Caller ID From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:59:00 0100 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Because if p2p voip means i get the same volume of junk phonecalls as i currently do spam emails i am not even going to _think_ about adopting it. We _need_ authentification. "Steve Totaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: __________ >why regulate? nobody regulates the return address on a letter sent via >USPS. > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Kevin Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 10:00 AM >Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP hackers gut Caller ID > > >> Adam Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > Chris Foster wrote: >> > > The Register is carrying a article written by Kevin Poulsen of >> > > Securtiy Focus, calling asterisk "..the most powerful tool for >> > > manipulating and accessing CPN data.." >> > > >> > > I hope NuFone doesn't drop asterisk-set-able callerid's after >> > > this article; i've been wanting that feature from voicepluse for >> > > a long time. >> > > >> > These kind of things will be reason (excuse) for Voip to be >> > regulated >> > >> Perhaps service providers who allow the Caller*ID to be set should >> insist that customers provide evidence that they own the phone >> numbers that they want to publish, and then limit the customers' >> choices to only the numbers in their approved list. Calling the >> customer on the provided number(s) would be an easy way to check, and >> a setup fee could be levied to cover the provider's time and expenses, if required. >> >> Being able to discover a "blocked" Caller*ID is another matter. Both >> are good areas for regulation. >> >> -- >> _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ >> _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h >> _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Asterisk-Users mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >> > >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users --__--__-- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 12:00:55 +0100 From: "Ben Merrills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 NAT question Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've got 4 Cisco 7960's and they're behind a firewall (sonic wall). The asterisk box is on a WAN connection on the other end of a DS3, the phones connect fine to the Asterisk server as you can see from the output of show sip peers below. tp3/tp3 <firewall-ip> D N 255.255.255.255 60665 Unmonitored tp2/tp2 <firewall-ip> D N 255.255.255.255 60646 Unmonitored tp1/tp1 <firewall-ip> D N 255.255.255.255 60649 Unmonitored Now, the Cisco phones are set to use nat (nat =3D 1) and in the SIP configuration, the phones are also configured for SIP. [tp1] type=3Dfriend secret=3Dtp1 host=3Ddynamic nat=3Dyes callerid=3D"Test Phone 1" I can make calls out over the phones, but can't get anything back in. If I call voicemail say, then that's fine. But if I try and call another phone behind the firewall, it just sits there :/ IS there a specific port range I need to open? Should I be using a different sip config? Cheers for any help, Ben www.griffin.com --__--__-- Message: 3 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 23:21:25 +1200 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Small Linux Distro Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks to everybody for your links and support. I think I have convinced all of the shareholders (tonight) that GPL is the way for anything we develop with regards to Asterisk, and they are going to put some more money into building a couple of prototypes boxes...(fun!!! hacking time!!!) So, once I have the hardware all setup and working properly, I'll post again here and find out what kind of features people would like to see in the LCD/button interface and what kind of statistics and options would be beneficial. Kind regards, Matt Riddell --__--__-- Message: 4 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 NAT question Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:54:49 -0400 From: "Hall, Eric M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I had the same problem. What I found is I needed to set register with proxy to yes in the sip config.=20 Hope this helps -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Merrills Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 7:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 NAT question I've got 4 Cisco 7960's and they're behind a firewall (sonic wall). The asterisk box is on a WAN connection on the other end of a DS3, the phones connect fine to the Asterisk server as you can see from the output of show sip peers below. tp3/tp3 <firewall-ip> D N 255.255.255.255 60665 Unmonitored tp2/tp2 <firewall-ip> D N 255.255.255.255 60646 Unmonitored tp1/tp1 <firewall-ip> D N 255.255.255.255 60649 Unmonitored Now, the Cisco phones are set to use nat (nat =3D 1) and in the SIP configuration, the phones are also configured for SIP. [tp1] type=3Dfriend secret=3Dtp1 host=3Ddynamic nat=3Dyes callerid=3D"Test Phone 1" I can make calls out over the phones, but can't get anything back in. If I call voicemail say, then that's fine. But if I try and call another phone behind the firewall, it just sits there :/ IS there a specific port range I need to open? Should I be using a different sip config? Cheers for any help, Ben www.griffin.com _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users --__--__-- Message: 5 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 13:02:41 +0100 (BST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Umar=20Sear?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: asterisk users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Minimum install required for Asterisk + voicemail & SIP friends from mysql Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have been trying to install asterisk with MySQL for voicemail and SIP friends. Using redhat 9 I am installing all the base components required for asterisk, mysql, mysql server and mysql-devel. If I do a make clean, make install without enabling the mysql options in the /apps/Makefile and /channels/Makefile all goes well and make completes. If I enable the options Make fails, when it gets to -L/usr/lib/mysql -lmysqlclient -lz with an error /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz Now If I do the same after installing Redhat 9 doing a complete install make completes successfully. Ideally I would (I am sure others would too) like to install the minimum required. Help/advice will be greatly appreciated. Umar. ___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com --__--__-- Message: 6 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:08:02 +0500 From: Junaid Saeed Uppal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ISDN, AVM C4, HFC-cards and echo Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a HFC-S Card with European Signaling , Can you tell me what distro/kernel are you using and how did you get the card detected with linux ? a small procedure ? regards ~uppal On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 10:12:04 +0100, Robinson Tim-W10277 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have 2 HFC cards. There is no echo. If you use the bri-stuff > drivers they use the native zaptel echo cancellers. And I have no echo. None. > > Rgds > Tim > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peer > Oliver Schmidt > Sent: 08 July 2004 08:47 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ISDN, AVM C4, HFC-cards and echo > > Hello, > > I've been using * for quite a while using AVM C4 card and a few > Grandstream Budgetone 102 hard phones plus couple of HandyTone 286. > > Echo is a big problem. I am getting used to it, but some users complain. > > Anyone has experience w/ regards to echo comparing the AVM C4 with two > HFC-cards? Before shelling out time and money, maybe someone else > already has done so, and could tell me if it is wortwhile. I only need > four B-channels, so two HFC cards should be all I need. > > Any help, pointers and tips are greatly appreciated. > > Thanks for your time. > > rgds > pos > > PS: Current CAPI.CONF settings: > [general] > nationalprefix=0 > internationalprefix=00 > rxgain=0.8 > txgain=0.8 > > [interfaces] > msn=123456 > echosquelsh=1 > incomingmsn=* > controller=1 > softdtmf=0 > context=default > ;echocancel=yes > ;echotail=64 > ;deflect=12345678 > devices=2 > callgroup=1 > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > --__--__-- Message: 7 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ISDN, AVM C4, HFC-cards and echo Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 13:21:41 +0100 From: "Robinson Tim-W10277" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RH9 and the drivers from=20 http://capi4linux.thepenguin.de/download/asterisk/ You don't use CAPI or isdn4linux. =20 Rgds Tim -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Junaid Saeed Uppal Sent: 08 July 2004 13:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ISDN, AVM C4, HFC-cards and echo I have a HFC-S Card with European Signaling , Can you tell me what distro/kernel are you using and how did you get the card detected with linux ? a small procedure ? regards ~uppal On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 10:12:04 +0100, Robinson Tim-W10277 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >=20 > I have 2 HFC cards. There is no echo. If you use the bri-stuff=20 >drivers they use the native zaptel echo cancellers. And I have no=20 >echo. None. >=20 > Rgds > Tim >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peer=20 >Oliver Schmidt > Sent: 08 July 2004 08:47 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ISDN, AVM C4, HFC-cards and echo =20 Hello, >=20 I've been using * for quite a while using AVM C4 card and a few=20 >Grandstream Budgetone 102 hard phones plus couple of HandyTone 286. >=20 > Echo is a big problem. I am getting used to it, but some users=20 >complain. >=20 > Anyone has experience w/ regards to echo comparing the AVM C4 with two > HFC-cards? Before shelling out time and money, maybe someone else=20 > already has done so, and could tell me if it is wortwhile. I only need > four B-channels, so two HFC cards should be all I need. >=20 > Any help, pointers and tips are greatly appreciated. >=20 > Thanks for your time. >=20 > rgds > pos >=20 > PS: Current CAPI.CONF settings: > [general] > nationalprefix=3D0 > internationalprefix=3D00 > rxgain=3D0.8 > txgain=3D0.8 >=20 > [interfaces] > msn=3D123456 > echosquelsh=3D1 > incomingmsn=3D* > controller=3D1 > softdtmf=3D0 > context=3Ddefault > ;echocancel=3Dyes > ;echotail=3D64 > ;deflect=3D12345678 > devices=3D2 > callgroup=3D1 > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users --__--__-- Message: 8 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 08:21:17 -0400 From: "Hall, Eric M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Question about Cisco IP Phone 7960 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I know this is a little off list but I can't think of a better place to ask this question. I upgrade the phone to 7.1 and it installed the Universal Application Loader. Now I'm getting Protocol Application Invalid after it reads tftp SIP(MAC).cnf Any ideas? Again sorry this is off topic --__--__-- Message: 9 Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 08:28:47 -0400 From: Brian Cuthie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP hackers gut Caller ID Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The real problem here is that people shouldn't be using callerid as an authentication scheme. Lots of people have had the ability to set arbitrary clid for years and yet banks and other institutions have stupidly used it to authenticate callers. Complaints should be directed to them and not the VoIP industry. -brian Alex wrote: >Here is what you can possibly do: > - Steal calling cards if they are useing caller id authentication >scheme > - Get access to personal banking information (Citibank uses callerid >as part of authentication process.) > - Purchase goods and services backed up by calling verification. > >I can go on and on for hours. Main point of story that [EMAIL PROTECTED] will hit >the fan and VOIP will be regulated badly. Especially if some known >terrorist will confess about using Vonage in Afaganistan.....or some of >drug dealers/weapon traders will be cought ..... > >Bug generraly author of that article is an idiot. He does not >understand the difference beteween VOIP and ISDN PRI. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of listas >iPfone >Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 6:26 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP hackers gut Caller ID > >This is very interesting... > >Regulations..USA... > >But... what can i do faking a caller id? stolen what? what is the point? > >miklos > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Steve Totaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 12:56 PM >Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP hackers gut Caller ID > > > > >>why regulate? nobody regulates the return address on a letter sent >>via USPS. >> >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Kevin Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 10:00 AM >>Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP hackers gut Caller ID >> >> >> >> >>>Adam Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Chris Foster wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>The Register is carrying a article written by Kevin Poulsen of >>>>>Securtiy Focus, calling asterisk "..the most powerful tool for >>>>>manipulating and accessing CPN data.." >>>>> >>>>>I hope NuFone doesn't drop asterisk-set-able callerid's after this >>>>>article; i've been wanting that feature from voicepluse for a long >>>>>time. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>These kind of things will be reason (excuse) for Voip to be >>>>regulated >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>Perhaps service providers who allow the Caller*ID to be set should >>>insist that customers provide evidence that they own the phone >>>numbers that they want to publish, and then limit the customers' >>>choices to only the numbers in their approved list. Calling the >>>customer on the provided number(s) would be an easy way to check, and >>>a setup fee could be levied to cover the provider's time and expenses, if required. >>> >>>Being able to discover a "blocked" Caller*ID is another matter. Both >>>are good areas for regulation. >>> >>>-- >>> _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ >>> _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h >>> _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>_/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Asterisk-Users mailing list >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >>> >>> >>> >>_______________________________________________ >>Asterisk-Users mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >> >> >> >> >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > --__--__-- Message: 10 From: "Stuart Baggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP hackers gut Caller ID Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 13:32:53 +0100 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is imperative that the ability to set caller ID's is kept as we need this in everyday business. stuart ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Cuthie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 1:28 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP hackers gut Caller ID > > The real problem here is that people shouldn't be using callerid as an > authentication scheme. Lots of people have had the ability to set > arbitrary clid for years and yet banks and other institutions have > stupidly used it to authenticate callers. Complaints should be > directed to them and not the VoIP industry. > > -brian > > > Alex wrote: > > >Here is what you can possibly do: > > - Steal calling cards if they are useing caller id authentication > >scheme > > - Get access to personal banking information (Citibank uses callerid > >as part of authentication process.) > > - Purchase goods and services backed up by calling verification. > > > >I can go on and on for hours. Main point of story that [EMAIL PROTECTED] will hit > >the fan > >and VOIP will be regulated badly. Especially if some known terrorist > >will confess about using Vonage in Afaganistan.....or some of drug dealers/weapon > >traders will be cought ..... > > > >Bug generraly author of that article is an idiot. He does not > >understand the > >difference beteween VOIP and ISDN PRI. > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of listas > >iPfone > >Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 6:26 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP hackers gut Caller ID > > > >This is very interesting... > > > >Regulations..USA... > > > >But... what can i do faking a caller id? stolen what? what is the point? > > > >miklos > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Steve Totaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 12:56 PM > >Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP hackers gut Caller ID > > > > > > > > > >>why regulate? nobody regulates the return address on a letter sent > >>via USPS. > >> > >> > >>----- Original Message ----- > >>From: "Kevin Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 10:00 AM > >>Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP hackers gut Caller ID > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>>Adam Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Chris Foster wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>The Register is carrying a article written by Kevin Poulsen of > >>>>>Securtiy Focus, calling asterisk "..the most powerful tool for > >>>>>manipulating and accessing CPN data.." > >>>>> > >>>>>I hope NuFone doesn't drop asterisk-set-able callerid's after > >>>>>this article; i've been wanting that feature from voicepluse for > >>>>>a long time. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>These kind of things will be reason (excuse) for Voip to be > >>>>regulated > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>Perhaps service providers who allow the Caller*ID to be set should > >>>insist that customers provide evidence that they own the phone > >>>numbers that they want to publish, and then limit the customers' > >>>choices to only the numbers in their approved list. Calling the > >>>customer on the provided number(s) would be an easy way to check, > >>>and a setup fee could be levied to cover the provider's time and expenses, if required. > >>> > >>>Being able to discover a "blocked" Caller*ID is another matter. > >>>Both are good areas for regulation. > >>> > >>>-- > >>> _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ > >>> _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h > >>> _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>_/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ > >>> > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>Asterisk-Users mailing list > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > >>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Asterisk-Users mailing list > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >> > >> > >> > >> > >_______________________________________________ > >Asterisk-Users mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Asterisk-Users mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > --__--__-- _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users End of Asterisk-Users Digest _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
