That should definitely be enough. As I have mentioned before - I have build a system with Linux+uClibc+busybox+asterisk in about 5.5 MB Flash and it generally use about 20 MB of memory when running.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of TC > Sent: 01 June 2004 03:29 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linksys WRT54GS > > > FYI the WRT54GS models have 8MB Flash & 32MB RAM > and a 200Mhz Processor ~ about P166 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tony Hoyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 11:37 AM > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linksys > > > > Stefan de Konink wrote: > > > Is Asterisk not a *little bit* too much for that processor? > SER could be > a > > > better choice? > > > > > The asterisk binary alone is larger than the total flash ram > space on the > linksys. > > > > I really doubt it's going to work.... > > > > Tony > > > > > > -- > > Te audire no possum. Musa sapientum fixa est in aure. > > > > Tony Hoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Key ID: 104D/4F4B6917 2003-09-13 > > Fingerprint: 063C AFB4 3026 F724 0AA2 02B8 E547 470E 4F4B 6917 > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
