Hi Andrew, Here's the results:-
[snipped out most of the above symbols messages] Reading symbols from /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/format_g726.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/format_g726.so Reading symbols from /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/format_g729.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/format_g729.so Reading symbols from /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_g729a.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_g729a.so #0 0x4044e862 in lsp_get_quant () from /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_g729a.so (gdb) bt #0 0x4044e862 in lsp_get_quant () from /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_g729a.so #1 0x00000000 in ?? () (gdb) x/5i $eip 0x4044e862 <lsp_get_quant+210>: fcomi %st(5),%st 0x4044e864 <lsp_get_quant+212>: jbe 0x4044eb40 <lsp_get_quant+944> 0x4044e86a <lsp_get_quant+218>: fsubr %st,%st(2) 0x4044e86c <lsp_get_quant+220>: faddp %st,%st(1) 0x4044e86e <lsp_get_quant+222>: fxch %st(1) (gdb) info registers eax 0x3 3 ecx 0x3c 60 edx 0x1 1 ebx 0x15 21 esp 0xbfffeef0 0xbfffeef0 ebp 0xbfffef10 0xbfffef10 esi 0x40459d40 1078304064 edi 0x40458940 1078298944 eip 0x4044e862 0x4044e862 eflags 0x10202 66050 cs 0x23 35 ss 0x2b 43 ds 0x2b 43 es 0x2b 43 fs 0x2b 43 gs 0x2b 43 fctrl 0x37f 895 fstat 0x1132 4402 ftag 0x400f 16399 fiseg 0x23 35 fioff 0x4044e860 1078257760 foseg 0x2b 43 fooff 0x0 0 ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit--- fop 0xcc 204 mxcsr 0x1f80 8064 orig_eax 0xffffffff -1 (gdb) And re the F00F bug, yep I figured it was probably very unlikely to be the root cause of the problem, as I have noticed messages when linux boots that it implements a workaround for the bug, so if that's the case then I guess all should be fine. Thanks, Chris Lee -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 22 May 2004 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G.729a beta codec on old Pentiums If you have gdb installed, try gdb /usr/sbin/asterisk (or whichever path is appropiate) name_of_core_file, and send back the results of bt x/5i $eip info registers and that should allow the developers or other people to work out what the problem is. As for the f00f bug, its unlikely that would be causing problems, the mention of f00f is there so that you can check to see if the machine is vulnerable. From memory, most os's now include work arounds for that bug. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
