I have two grandstream budtetone-100 and cisco 7960g phones. When I talk via speaker phone on either of the phones I get a lot of echo. Any suggestions? Also how do I turn on the mark echo canceller.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 4:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #3413 - 14 msgs Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. VoiceMailBox wav file format in EMAIL. (James Gardiner) 2. TDM400P Issues (Jeremy Bogan) 3. Re: TDM400P Issues (Vic Cross) 4. Re: TDM400P Issues (Jeremy Bogan) 5. Re: TDM400P Issues (Christian Hoffmeyer) 6. Re: TDM400P Issues (Jeremy Bogan) 7. Re: ZAPRTC question(s) (Tony Mountifield) 8. Re: TDM400P Issues (Jeremy Bogan) 9. Re: TDM400P Issues (Jeremy Bogan) 10. Re: X100P and NTL (ex Cable + Wireless) (Stephen Davies) 11. Re: TDM400P Issues (Vic Cross) 12. Re: TDM400P Issues (Jeremy Bogan) 13. Re: Dial Outside SIP address from AGI (Ron McMillin) 14. Re: X100P and NTL (ex Cable + Wireless) (Vic Cross) --__--__-- Message: 1 From: "James Gardiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:12:15 +1000 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] VoiceMailBox wav file format in EMAIL. Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all, I am not sure if tis is a bug but.. Was learning about VM etc to see how it all worked, and I noticed the following.. In the default install, the VM system leaves 3 different copies of the Voice message. Size filename 13kb Msg0000.gsm 13kb Msg0000.wav 122kb Msg0000.WAV <- under UNIX we have case sensitive file names of course. I wanted to have a look at these files so loaded them into SOUND FORGE 6. This first thing I noticed was that the LARGER file is of much HIGHER volume. Like it had been normalised to 100% The smaller was file, when loaded into sound forge, did not load properly, only the first 2 seconds loads. Can anyone explain these issues and why they exist? All in all, I was wondering what would be the best format for best quality but with still great compression. I want to archive all calls for a period of time with self expire. (For example dedicate 5 gig disk space to the last number of calls that can fit in the 5gig.) I want to store the best quality possible but also make best use of disk space, so I can store for even longer periods. I was considering ogg but then is occurred to me that GSM or other codecs designed for audio with this frequency response may be better. (But the GSM file above is not as clear as the WAV ones produced.) I was also wondering if the VM system when emailing the audio can be setup to use something like ogg or MP3? Comments appreciated, James Gardiner --__--__-- Message: 2 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Jeremy Bogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:14:43 +1000 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Issues Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I just got my TDM400P card (2 modules) and i installed it no probs. The card is detected fine, but for some reason when I add the card to zaptel.conf i get the following error: --snip-- ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 2: Invalid argument (22) Did you forget that FXS interfaces are configured with FXO signalling and that FXO interfaces use FXS signalling? --snip-- My /etc/zaptel.conf looks like: --snip-- fxsks=1-2 fxoks=3-4 loadzone=au defaultzone=au --snip-- I currently have 2 x X100P cards that work no problem. Running a ztcfg -vvvv I get: Zaptel Configuration ====================== Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) Channel 02: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 02) Channel 03: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 03) Channel 04: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 04) 4 channels configured. ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 2: Invalid argument (22) Did you forget that FXS interfaces are configured with FXO signalling and that FXO interfaces use FXS signalling? Anyone have any ideas? I tried doing a search but couldn't really find anything. Thanks! -- jeremy bogan [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] segment publishing - design.develop.host --__--__-- Message: 3 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:28:09 +1000 (EST) From: Vic Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Issues Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] G'day Jeremy, On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Jeremy Bogan wrote: > --snip-- > ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 2: Invalid argument (22) > Did you forget that FXS interfaces are configured with FXO signalling > and that FXO interfaces use FXS signalling? > --snip-- > > My /etc/zaptel.conf looks like: > > --snip-- > fxsks=1-2 > fxoks=3-4 > loadzone=au > defaultzone=au > --snip-- > > I currently have 2 x X100P cards that work no problem. > > Running a ztcfg -vvvv I get: > > Zaptel Configuration > ====================== > > > Channel map: > > Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) > Channel 02: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 02) > Channel 03: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 03) > Channel 04: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 04) > > 4 channels configured. > > ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 2: Invalid argument (22) > Did you forget that FXS interfaces are configured with FXO signalling > and that FXO interfaces use FXS signalling? This is your clue... Do exactly what it says... At a guess, I'd say you've loaded the wcfxs module before wcfxo. This will push your existing X100P interfaces out to channels 3 and 4. Either change your zaptel.conf to suit, or load wcfxo prior to wcfxs to have your FXO cards appear where they used to. Cheers, Vic Cross --__--__-- Message: 4 From: Jeremy Bogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Issues Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:33:02 +1000 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Vic, > This is your clue... Do exactly what it says... > At a guess, I'd say you've loaded the wcfxs module before wcfxo. This > will push your existing X100P interfaces out to channels 3 and 4. > Either > change your zaptel.conf to suit, or load wcfxo prior to wcfxs to have > your > FXO cards appear where they used to. That's the problem, i've tried that. I swapped them around so that the X100P's are channel 3-4 and the TDM400P is channel 1-2, but the same thing: ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: Invalid argument (22) Did you forget that FXS interfaces are configured with FXO signalling and that FXO interfaces use FXS signalling? When I startup zaptel it loads as follows: Loading zaptel hardware modules: wcfxo wcfxs wcusb I can't figure it out.... -- jeremy bogan [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] segment publishing - design.develop.host --__--__-- Message: 5 From: "Christian Hoffmeyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Issues Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:39:02 -0500 Organization: www.yottadot.org Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Bogan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 1:33 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Issues > That's the problem, i've tried that. I swapped them around so that the > X100P's are channel 3-4 and the TDM400P is channel 1-2, but the same > thing: > > ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: Invalid argument (22) > Did you forget that FXS interfaces are configured with FXO signalling > and that FXO interfaces use FXS signalling? Sounds like an irq problem. If it works with both x100ps in the same slots without the tdm, but the tdm card makes it fail, try moving the tdm card to another pci slot. Christian Hoffmeyer YottaDot Solutions Huntsville, AL (iax) 700.859.4508 --__--__-- Message: 6 From: Jeremy Bogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Issues Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:42:51 +1000 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sounds like an irq problem. If it works with both x100ps in the same > slots > without the tdm, but the tdm card makes it fail, try moving the tdm > card to > another pci slot. Thanks, i'll give it a try. -- jeremy bogan [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] segment publishing - design.develop.host --__--__-- Message: 7 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony Mountifield) Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 06:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Software Insight Ltd., Winchester, UK Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: ZAPRTC question(s) Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fran Boon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 17:37, Tony Mountifield wrote: > > The zaprtc.c code is based on the rtc.c from 2.4.20. I am running 2.4.22, > > so I isolated the zaprtc changes, and re-applied them to a copy of the > > rtc.c from 2.4.22. It works a treat. > > I've also enhanced rtcsetup to be a proper daemon. > > Any chance of sharing these changes somewhere? > e.g. Wiki Yes, I'm intending to - I just haven't had the time to do so yet! :-) Cheers, Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org --__--__-- Message: 8 From: Jeremy Bogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Issues Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:53:43 +1000 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sounds like an irq problem. If it works with both x100ps in the same >> slots >> without the tdm, but the tdm card makes it fail, try moving the tdm >> card to >> another pci slot. Swapped the card to another slot, still no dice :( -- jeremy bogan [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] segment publishing - design.develop.host --__--__-- Message: 9 From: Jeremy Bogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Issues Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:59:13 +1000 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fixed it, had to modify my config, it now reads: fxsks=1 fxoks=2-3 fxsks=4 loadzone=au defaultzone=au -- jeremy bogan [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] segment publishing - design.develop.host --__--__-- Message: 10 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:03:25 +0200 (SAST) From: Stephen Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P and NTL (ex Cable + Wireless) Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Alex Brett wrote: > Has anybody got any experience using an X100P on an NTL phone line in > the UK (I'm in an ex Cable & Wireless area if that makes any difference). > > The problem I'm having (and judging by the number of references to it > I've found searching it is a common one) is getting * to detect when the > line has been hung up. It doesn't matter if it comes through to a > person directly as they can just hang that phone up, but when it hits > voicemail, and it sits there for two minutes recording an empty message, > and then emails it to the person it can be a bit annoying! Hi Alex, Indeed the call end termination doesn't work on an NTL line. I'm not so sure it works too well on other lines either. I did some work a while back to add detection of the UK busy/hangup signal on the line, but I never got it working well enough to depend on it. The problem is that it is a single frequency tone. (The US one is dual-tone). Women's voices used to sometimes trigger my detector - causing hangups. The main practical issue is with voicemail, as you say. My final solution was to switch to ISDN. Steve --__--__-- Message: 11 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 17:11:57 +1000 (EST) From: Vic Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Issues Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Jeremy Bogan wrote: > Fixed it, had to modify my config, it now reads: > > fxsks=1 > fxoks=2-3 > fxsks=4 > loadzone=au > defaultzone=au This looks wrong. What is the full output of ztcfg -vvv? I'd be surprised if this worked as expected once you got * started... Out of curiosity, what's the arrangement of the cards in the slots? Is the TDM card between the two X100Ps? Cheers, Vic --__--__-- Message: 12 From: Jeremy Bogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Issues Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 17:14:16 +1000 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > This looks wrong. What is the full output of ztcfg -vvv? Zaptel Configuration ====================== Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) Channel 02: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 02) Channel 03: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 03) Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 04) 4 channels configured. > I'd be surprised if this worked as expected once you got * started... Well now that I just tried * it doesn't work... --snip-- [chan_zap.so] => (Zapata Telephony w/PRI) == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf': Found -- Registered channel 1, FXS Kewlstart signalling Apr 13 17:13:42 WARNING[16384]: chan_zap.c:665 zt_open: Unable to specify channel 4: No such device Apr 13 17:13:42 ERROR[16384]: chan_zap.c:5319 mkintf: Unable to open channel 4: No such device here = 0, tmp->channel = 4, channel = 4 Apr 13 17:13:42 ERROR[16384]: chan_zap.c:7355 setup_zap: Unable to register channel '4' Apr 13 17:13:42 WARNING[16384]: loader.c:313 ast_load_resource: chan_zap.so: load_module failed, returning -1 == Unregistered channel type 'Tor' == Unregistered channel type 'Zap' -- Unregistered channel 1 -- Unregistered channel 2 Apr 13 17:13:42 WARNING[16384]: loader.c:408 load_modules: Loading module chan_zap.so failed! --snip-- > Out of curiosity, what's the arrangement of the cards in the slots? Is > the TDM card between the two X100Ps? The TDM is above the two X100P's, before it was below them. -- jeremy bogan [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] segment publishing - design.develop.host --__--__-- Message: 13 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 00:16:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Ron McMillin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dial Outside SIP address from AGI To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --0-2089280042-1081840585=:81681 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thank you. This explains it. Nathaniel Powning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Ron McMillin wrote: > Is it possible to dial an OUTSIDE SIP address while inside AGI application? For > example, within extension context, I could use > [from-sip] > exten => 7723,1,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) and this works > > whereas when I'm inside agi app, > $AGI->exec('Dial',"SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]") and this DOESN'T work. Perl will interpret the @ symbol as referencing an array, put a backslash before that character in your SIP address. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users --0-2089280042-1081840585=:81681 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii <DIV>Thank you. This explains it.<BR><BR><B><I>Nathaniel Powning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]></I></B> wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR>On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Ron McMillin wrote:<BR><BR>> Is it possible to dial an OUTSIDE SIP address while inside AGI application? For example, within extension context, I could use<BR>> [from-sip]<BR>> exten => 7723,1,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) and this works<BR>><BR>> whereas when I'm inside agi app,<BR>> $AGI->exec('Dial',"SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]") and this DOESN'T work.<BR><BR>Perl will interpret the @ symbol as referencing an array, put a backslash<BR>before that character in your SIP address.<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Asterisk-Users mailing list<BR>[EMAIL PROTECTED]<BR>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users<BR>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<BR>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</BLOCKQUOTE></DIV> --0-2089280042-1081840585=:81681-- --__--__-- Message: 14 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 17:32:10 +1000 (EST) From: Vic Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P and NTL (ex Cable + Wireless) Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Stephen Davies wrote: > I did some work a while back to add detection of the UK busy/hangup > signal on the line, but I never got it working well enough to depend > on it. The problem is that it is a single frequency tone. (The US > one is dual-tone). Women's voices used to sometimes trigger my > detector - causing hangups. I'm looking at the same thing now, for AU busy tone. If there's some work-in-progress that you wouldn't mind releasing, I'd be keen to have a look. I think the problem with the current code (for us!) is the short length of time over which it tests for busy. Extending this might help prevent voice-off. It will be a balancing act though, as down here the ringing indication is the same frequency tone (and I'd rather not have my outgoing calls detected as busy when they are actually ringing). Cheers, Vic Cross --__--__-- _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users End of Asterisk-Users Digest _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
