On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Michael T Farnworth wrote: > It appears that the final argument to all these functions (normally a 0 > or 1) has been dropped, but it hasn't been fixed in chan_oss.c or > chan_alsa.c. > The easy fix is just to drop the final arguments for all these functions > and then to kick off the compile again.
I had to do the *opposite* of this to get chan_sccp to compile against a freshly-updated CVS of Asterisk and Zaptel. I had to add the extra parameter to these calls in the chan_sccp code. I took it that the extra parameter was added recently, since the last time I compiled the same chan_sccp tree it worked fine. Cheers, Vic Cross _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
