Derek Samford wrote:

I believe that's what Steven was saying. That if this code was to ever
be included in the asterisk source then there would need to be a
disclaimer from Derek Bruce, as well as the Freeradius dev team. He
pointed out that this keeps there from being any need for a fork, and
makes things much less complicated for Digium.




That fact is not the problem. It the fact that there is no FORK of Asterisk that Digium secretly maintains. This is how rumors get started. Didja hear about RedHat buying out Digium ? Or was it Microsoft?



Jeremy McNamara






-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy McNamara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 4:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: There is no FORK! (WAS Re: [Asterisk-Users] BETA RADIUS support
for Asterisk)

Steven Critchfield wrote:



Maybe you should read and understand the comments on licensing. Maybe a
going over the licensing threads here would also be needed.

For the short story, Digium dual licenses asterisk. There is a GPL
license for those of us that don't need proprietary support, and then
there is a proprietary license that is charged for and is a fork of
asterisk by Digium.




Mark needs full control of the copyright so things like Open H.323, OpenSSL and G.729 can exist in Asterisk. There is no FORK!




This is why disclaimers are important for those who
contribute patches. If there isn't a disclaimer, Digium can not include
it in the proprietary version of asterisk. If they can not include it


in


the proprietary version, they tend to not allow it in their version of
the GPL releases so they don't have to maintain a real proprietary fork
as well as the GPL version.





THERE IS NO FORK! There is a total of ONE (1) Asterisk source tree.





So far the majority of us are cool with this fact and can work around
any annoyances this causes. But as stated in the comments in that bug,
there needs to be a disclaimer from free radius to use their software


in


such a way.






A disclaimer is only needed if the code is to be included with Asterisk.


Please get your facts straight before posting.



Jeremy McNamara





_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ###########################################

This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to