jason- Least powerful was 2.2GHz P4, and E400P.
Not really that "weak"! Cheers Scott Scott M. Stingel Emerging Voice Technology Inc. Email: scott "at " evtmedia.com URL: www.evtmedia.com >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Boyd >Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 6:05 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IVR setup (was "Dialogic >supported well?") > >On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:44:09 -0000 >"Scott Stingel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I was going to update the page called "Dimensioning an Asterisk >> System", at the request of Philipp von Klitzing, who set up >that page. >> Maybe at the same time, we could do the page you refer to? > >That would be great. For the record, the pages in question are: > >http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+dimensioning >http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+hardware+recommendations > >and they do overlap a little. > >> I've used a couple of different setups, and all hit roughly the same >> maximum call rate. The fastest setup is 2.4G Xeon's, Fedora 1, and >> TE410P's. E400P's and TE410P's were about the same in performance in >> my load testing. > >Out of curiosity, what was the least powerful system that yielded the >same maximum call rate? > >Thanks, >Jason >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
