On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Dan Cropp <[email protected]> wrote:
> Currently using PJSIP. First, they want me to get this working with the > existing PJSIP configuration, but then setup a second box using chan_sip > performing similar work. > > > > For PJSIP… > > I currently have an endpoint configured to a system using IP based > authentication. It is configured with a match setting in the endpoint > section. > > All channels coming from that IP address go to this endpoint. > > > > They want me to keep this endpoint, but add a new endpoint where we > register with them. > > > > Existing… > > [transport1] > > type = transport > > bind = 0.0.0.0 > > protocol = udp > > > > [1002] > > type = aor > > remove_existing = yes > > contact = sip:[email protected] > > > > [1002] > > type = endpoint > > context = mycontext > > transport = transport1 > > accountcode = 6 > > dtmf_mode = inband > > device_state_busy_at = 48 > > force_rport = no > > identify_by = username > > from_user = 1002 > > disallow = all > > allow = ulaw > > acl = acl1 > > > > [identify112] > > type = identify > > endpoint = 1002 > > match = [email protected] > Check this first... identify112 probably failed to load because the match parameter can only take an ip address plus an optional netmask, or a hostname. The '1002@' is invalid. > > > I setup the registration and the endpoint. > > > > [286] > > type = aor > > remove_existing = yes > > contact = sip:[email protected] > > qualify_frequency = 60 > > > > [auth8] > > type = auth > > username = 286 > > password = yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy > > > > [286] > > type = endpoint > > context = mycontext > > transport = transport1 > > outbound_auth = auth8 > > aors = 286 > > accountcode = 22 > > dtmf_mode = inband > > device_state_busy_at = 48 > > force_rport = no > > disallow = all > > allow = ulaw > > acl = acl1 > > > > [registration3] > > type = registration > > transport = transport1 > > client_uri = sip:[email protected] > > server_uri = sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > contact_user = 286 > > outbound_auth = auth8 > > expiration = 3600 > > > > The registration for the second endpoint works fine. However, when I call > through the other system for 286, it is failing. For the INVITE from the > other switch, the from_user varies depending on who is calling. Asterisk > logs report “No matching endpoint found” when it processes the INVITE for > 286. > > > > I believe the reason INVITEs work for the other channel is because they > are programmed to support the match for this IP address. > > > > Can anyone offer some suggestions? > You may be able to use the 'line and 'endpoint' registration parameters... [registration3] type = registration ... line = yes endpoint = 286 This causes asterisk to put the encoded endpoint name in the outgoing Contact header. If the provider properly echos back Contact parameters when sending responses or new requests, asterisk will use the line parameter to match an endpoint. I'll have to double check but I believe we do that BEFORE checking any identify object for a match. > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk. > org/ > > New to Asterisk? Start here: > https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > -- George Joseph Digium, Inc. | Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/ New to Asterisk? Start here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
