On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 08:54:22PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I found a page that assisted in running asterisk as non-root.
>
> My question is why is the default install not more friendly in this
> manner???
It requires either creating a user or making sure such a user exists.
That's not a firendly thing to do in a typical 'make install'.
It is quite the expected thing on just about any packaging of Asterisk,
because there are relatively standard methods of creating users in the
context of a specific distribution.
>
> I mean basically the instructions changed the permissions to allow GROUP
> write, so 775 instead of 755 and changed the astrun to be a directory
That assumes USER or GROUP exists.
>
> Why doesn't the default install do this? Seems logical to me. I installed
> 11.25.1
If you're still not convinved, Patches are welcomed (for the master branch).
--
Tzafrir Cohen
+972-50-7952406 mailto:[email protected]
http://www.xorcom.com
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/
New to Asterisk? Start here:
https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
