Ok, let med rephrase this: Does anyone actually uses Confbridge and what are your experiences? How about local channels in combination with Confbridge?
/Johan Den 2015-09-23 kl. 13:37, skrev Johan Wilfer:
Hi! I did some tests with Asterisk 11.19.0 and Confbridge. I've wanting to migrate from Meetme to Confbridge for a long time now. For two participants in a conference - one actual call and one local channel that are recording - the cpu sits at 20%. The result was the same with res_timing_pthread and res_timing_timerfd. For 15 calls the cpu sits at 200%. (res_timing_pthread) This is a Xeon E5620 @ 2.40GHz server, and with Meetme/Dahdi the load for this was hardly noticeable. Kernel: 2.6.32-openvz-042stab111.11-amd64, Debian 7 OpenVZ HN, with Debian 7 VE. And as I said - with Meetme in the same server you can barley notice the load. And with Confbridge it jumps to 20%... Any idea why Confbridge comes with such a performance hit? /Johan
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
