On 12-02-14 16:58, Steven Wheeler wrote:

*From:*[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jonas Kellens
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2014 3:46 AM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* [asterisk-users] Realtime Call Queues : call members in certain order

Hello,

I'm using MySQL realtime Call Queues (table /queues/ and table /queue_members/).

I would like to ring the members of the call queue in a certain order. Therefore I use ring strategy /lineair /and I put the members into the table /queue_members/ in the order in which they have to be rang.


So I have the queue :

| name | musicclass | announce | context | timeout | monitor_type | monitor_format | queue_youarenext | queue_thereare | queue_callswaiting | queue_holdtime | queue_minutes | queue_seconds | queue_lessthan | queue_thankyou | queue_reporthold | announce_frequency | announce_round_seconds | announce_holdtime | announce_position | retry | wrapuptime | maxlen | servicelevel | strategy | joinempty | leavewhenempty | eventmemberstatus | eventwhencalled | reportholdtime | memberdelay | weight | timeoutrestart | periodic_announce | periodic_announce_frequency | ringinuse |
+----------------+------------+----------+---------+---------+--------------+----------------+------------------+----------------+--------------------+----------------+---------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+--------------------+------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------+------------+--------+--------------+----------+-----------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------+----------------+-------------+--------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------------------+-----------+
| queue6 | default | NULL | | 12 | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 30 | NULL | No | yes | 5 | 10 | 0 | NULL | linear | strict | strict | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | no | | 0 | no |
+----------------+------------+----------+---------+---------+--------------+----------------+------------------+----------------+--------------------+----------------+---------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+--------------------+------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------+------------+--------+--------------+----------+-----------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------+----------------+-------------+--------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------------------+-----------+


and queue members :

+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
| uniqueid | membername | queue_name | interface | penalty | paused |
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
|       44 | queuemem4  | queue6 | SIP/queuemem4  |       0 |   NULL |
|       45 | queuemem2  | queue6 | SIP/queuemem2  |       0 |   NULL |
|       46 | queuemem5  | queue6 | SIP/queuemem5  |       0 |   NULL |
|       47 | queuemem1  | queue6 | SIP/queuemem1  |       0 |   NULL |
|       48 | queuemem10 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem10 |       0 |   NULL |
|       49 | queuemem18 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem18 |       0 |   NULL |
|       50 | queuemem17 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem17 |       0 |   NULL |
|       51 | queuemem12 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem12 |       0 |   NULL |
|       52 | queuemem16 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem16 |       0 |   NULL |
|       53 | queuemem13 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem13 |       0 |   NULL |
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+



You can see that the member /queuemem4/ is first in line to be rang (has the first and lowest uniqueid in the table).

But the first member that is being rang, is /queuemem1/. How come ??


Kind regards,

Jonas.

Jonas,

We encountered the same problem. It is a bug in the Queue application. The Queue application actually orders members by their interface value. Here is the bug report I opened https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-18480 <https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-18480> which was closed as "Not A Bug" by Digium. We worked around this by prepending an integer (001__, 002__, ...) to the interface in the database table and then removing it later in the dial plan. Hope this helps.

Steven Wheeler


Hello,

thank you for your reply.


Is it the "membername" or the "interface" that needs to be sorted to have a certain order in the call queue ?


How do you remove the prefix (integer) from a call queue member from dialplan ?

If you call the queue in your dialplan as follow :

exten => s,n,Queue(${queuename},,,,${timeout})

How can you "edit" its members ??



Kind regards,

Jonas.


-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
               http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to