I just find it insecure because if someone does hack they can use any codec.
I suppose not very insecure but I like to lock things down as much as possible.




On 7/28/2013 9:09 PM, Matt Behrens wrote:
On Jul 28, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Andrew Colin <[email protected]> wrote:

if you say allow=all it will work but thats not secure at all.
How is allow=all insecure?  I can see inefficient, but what would make that 
insecure eludes me.



--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
                http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
               http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to