Not doubting how quickly Nagios can respond, but if the Nagios solution is 
going to place a call using Asterisk, wouldn’t it be just as efficient (or more 
so) to depend on Asterisk? 

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christopher 
Harrington
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 3:30 PM
To: Benny Amorsen
Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Capture queue agent drop and put caller back in 
queue

 

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Benny Amorsen <[email protected]> wrote:

 

Can a Nagios-based solution provide quicker failover than the 90 seconds
provided by sip timers or the 10-30 seconds provided by rtptimeout?

 

Certainly; Nagios can detect missed ping responses with a granularity of single 
seconds.




 

-- 
-Chris Harrington

ACSDi Office: 763.559.5800

Mobile Phone: 612.326.4248

 

--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
               http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to