Deepesh D wrote:
If C1 dials S1 and then S1 dials S2 to transfer the call then S1 still
remains in the loop till the call is finished. What I wanted to do is
to reduce the number of calls on S1, so as soon as S1 receives a call
from C1 it redirects the call to S2 using 'Transfer' application and
exits from the loop, the call should now be handled by S2

With some crafty configuration you can achieve this using Transfer. With promiscredir disabled Asterisk will not follow the SIP URI in the 302 response sent back as a result of calling Transfer. The call reenters the dialplan at the user portion of the URI passed back and executes dialplan as normal. By prefixing the user portion with a unique identifier you can write dialplan that strips the prefix and then dials out to S2.

Flow being:

C1 executes Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}@S1) (matched using _1NXXNXXXXXX)
S1 executes Transfer(002${EXTEN}) (matched using _1NXXNXXXXXX)
C1 executes Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:3}@S2) (matched using _0021NXXNXXXXXX)

So simply:
C1 calls S1
S1 decides to send it to S2, but wants to tell C1 to do it directly
S1 sends back a SIP message saying hey call 00218005551212 instead
C1 matches the number to the dialplan which explicitly calls out through S2
S2 receives the call and life is good

* Note: This requires control over both C1 and S1, you can't just do it to every random system calling.

If you don't get the finer details of this just experiment with the general idea and configuration option I mentioned. It won't hurt.

Cheers,

--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at:  www.digium.com  & www.asterisk.org

--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
              http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to