On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:02 AM, C F <[email protected]> wrote: > I find that the bottom line of all polycom haters is ones inability of > comprehending the config files and not in its quality. >
We have no problem with their config files. They are no worse than anything else, including the SPA series phones that we greatly prefer over the Polycom. The Polycom phones simply are more effort and more time-consuming than the SPA phones, and some others (though there are worse phones). We hate working with them for a wide variety of reasons, but the config files are certainly not one of them. > However check out Panasonic. They make a sip conference phone. > I didn't know about the conference phone from them. We sell their wireless phones and found them extremely annoying to learn to configure, with lots of quirks and bugs, but once they are working they are good. Once you get to know the oddities and have a suitable provisioning server set up, deploying more is no problem. Troubleshooting is annoying because the documentation is poor and there are lots of quirks/bugs/unexpected "features." User acceptance on the Panasonic is very good. -- Carlos Alvarez TelEvolve 602-889-3003
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
