Also, Asterisk the userspace process  processes OPTIONS requests more slowly - 
and variably - than an OS network stack processes an ICMP echo request.

--
This message was painstakingly thumbed out on my mobile, so apologies for 
brevity, errors, and general sloppiness.

Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
260 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/

On Aug 20, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Steve Edwards <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Bruce B wrote:
> 
>> Pinging a phone set I get 0.529 ms round trip delay. Running "sip show 
>> peers" in Asterisk CLI I see anywhere from 5 milli seconds to 280 ms. How 
>> are both of these different and why are they so different? Is the latter 
>> based on SIP packets return?
>> I have a paging device that shows close to 280 ms which is not right but at 
>> ping it's 0.5 ms.
> 
> Some routers consider responding to pings to be a 'low priority' request.
> 
> -- 
> Thanks in advance,
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Steve Edwards       [email protected]      Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST
> Newline                                              Fax: +1-760-731-3000
> 
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>              http://www.asterisk.org/hello
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
               http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to