I thought it was going to be 1.10.0
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of vip killa Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 2:48 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 10.0.0 better than 2.0.0? I agree, the numbering seems to make no sense. Oh well it's just an arbitrary measurement of non-progress anyway On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Tony Mountifield <[email protected]> wrote: I read Kevin's piece in asterisk-announce about the new numbering scheme, and saw in svn-commits some tagging of 10.0.0-beta1. Perhaps I'm thick (I hope not!), but I really can't see why calling the next version 10.0.0 is any better than calling it 2.0.0! I'm surprised not to have seen ANY talk in asterisk-users or aserisk-dev about it, since the announcement. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [email protected] - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: [email protected] - http://tony.mountifield.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
