On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, John Todd wrote:
So, to boil your problem down to what I think is the problem:>produce a dialtone fast enough."
"When you attach an inbound call to the DISA application, it does not
<snip>
[main1] ; ; Take any number, and give it to the DISA. The DISA ; just then takes anything typed in within the (unchangeable) ; timer values, and hands it off to main2 to be post-processed. ; I include the standard i,h,t values for pedantic reasons. ; exten => _X.,1,DISA(no-password,main2) exten => _X.,2,Hangup ; exten => h,1,Hangup exten => i,1,Congestion exten => i,2,Hangup exten => t,1,Congestion exten => t,2,Hangup
Not to point out the obvious, but isn't the delay he's seeing caused by the _X. and the digittimeout? Couldn't this be resolved by using a more specific match on the DISA instead of _X. ?
Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ah, yes, that's probably the case. Without further information from the poster about how he was getting calls into the context, I assumed that this was a PRI or something that handed a DID to the context. If this is an FXO or some type of T1 trunking, then yes, the "s" extension would be more appropriate if this was an "immediate=yes" type of situation.
GIGO.
JT _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
