On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 04:24:08PM +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> I know a lot has changed over the past couple of years, and even monthly, and
> that Asterisk running within a virtualised environment is very happy indeed.
> If one would only be using SIP/IAX would Xen/KVM be the best solution ? / or
> perhaps VServer/LXC maybe advantageous due to binary hashing. Your thoughts
> would be very welcome.
VServer / OpenVZ / LXC run the the instances on top of the same kernel.
They use kernel-level seperation. So this means that they basically see
the subsets of the same file system and such.
KVM / Xen provide the view of a different machine. The guest machine run
its own kernel. I guess this is better if you don't trust the guest, but
you pay more in resource consumption. If you want to run a different
kernel, you must use this one.
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:[email protected]
+972-50-7952406 mailto:[email protected]
http://www.xorcom.com iax:[email protected]/tzafrir
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
