On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 11:47, Clif Jones wrote: > It was actually a good question. When I learned Unix internals, the > shared libs and executables > where "busy" when loaded because of swap-in/swap-out requirements. Swap > space was > used to store the core memory for the apps, and the app itself was > memory mapped when > needed. That is why you couldn't overwrite it when it was in use. You > had to rename it. > I guess Linux has worked around this. Wish I had time to look and see > how. :)
Probably more to the point is that the cost of memory and storage is such that the multiple copies isn't as much of a problem now. I could see that as being the case when memory was way too expensive to waste and hard drives required a DOD defense contract to purchase. -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
