Thank you for your info Moises. For those who want to have a high density system, can you provide what modifications to the Dahdi (or anything else) do you make?
Regards HASSAN On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 19:39, Moises Silva <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Nyamul Hassan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> While this is too many "eggs" in one basket, but can be useful if you have >> "too many" E(T)1s say equivalent to a STM1 (OC3) or more. In that case, it >> would be too many boxes at 8ports / box. >> >> Somewhere in the mailing list, Sangoma devs said that they do 32E(T)1 >> per box on the labs quite frequently, although mostly for load testing. >> >> > That is correct, that is our typical load test scenario. However, Asterisk > is a complex system with many features. Our testing focus on SIP to TDM > bridging, meaning the only used applications are Answer() and Dial() with > the DAHDI and SIP channel drivers, typically with latest 1.4. > > Additionally we always compile DAHDI modifying the chunk size to reduce the > interrupt load. > > As far as your question about PCIe 2.0, yes the A108 should work just fine > there. > > Moises Silva > Senior Software Engineer > Sangoma Technologies Inc. | NEW 100 Renfrew Drive, Suite 100, Markham ON > L3R 9R6 Canada > t. 1 905 474 1990 x128 | e. [email protected] > > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
