Sorry to reply so late, I am months behind and catching up.

 

I have been inspecting this on my own systems, and the results are inconsistent 
to say the least. I’ve been dumping these to the verbose logs for some time and 
monitoring them, but I have not been able to determine why the numbers are so 
far off. I am more concerned with the packets lost due to priority queuing 
within our network.

 

Here is an example just today:

ssrc=583450581

themssrc=1093951555

lp=0

rxjitter=0.003219

rxcount=1100

txjitter=0.000275

txcount=1108

rlp=57702

rtt=0.036000

 

If the txcount is only 1108, how can the remote lost packet count be 57702? 
Unless the call was nearly inaudible?

 

I did verify with this end user, and the call was just fine. Is this an issue 
with the phone at the remote end misreporting?

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mindaugas Kezys
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 01:01
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] RTPAUDIOQOS

 

Check this link: http://wiki.kolmisoft.com/index.php/RTPAUDIOQOS_Demystified

 

Regards,

Mindaugas Kezys

http://www.kolmisoft.com

VoIP Billing and Routing Solutions

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DHAVAL INDRODIYA
Sent: 2009 m. rugsėjo 22 d. 09:28
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] RTPAUDIOQOS

 

hey all,

can any body know what this parameter stands for 

i got RTPAUDIOQOS while i have SIP channels 

but could not understand then what this parameter tell

ssrc=254186206;themssrc=2024901615;lp=0;rxjitter=0.020917;rxcount=150;txjitter=0.000000;txcount=83;rlp=0;rtt=14818.715000

if any one know plese help me to or give any documentation link

regards
Dhaval

_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to