On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 14:12, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
> John Todd wrote:
>
> > I realize this is a major code shift, since it would require work in
> > pretty much every single application. It's easy for me to talk about
> > this since I can't accomplish such a task. However, without attention
> > now, this may never be solved, which would be a pity because it's a
> > real crimp in the style of anyone doing more than trivial dialplan
> > manipulation - anyone doing cascading dial failovers will attest to that.
>
>
> We were talking in the conf the other day about possibly creating a 'F'
> extension for 'failure'. I'm not sure if this is even remotely close to
> what your talking about or not.
Hmm, F would be good, possibly B also. I could see a good case for the
lead digit for a pattern doing a goto to a context that could define
those for outbound calls.
[normal_extensions]
exten => 9,1,Goto(Extended_out,s,1)
[Extended_out]
exten => s,1,Playtones(dialtone)
exten => F,1,background(Failed)
exten => F,2,hangup
exten => B,1,congestion
exten => _NXXXXXX,1,Dial(Zap/g2/${EXTEN})
This example tightly controls the B and F special extensions to a
specific dial in the context.
--
Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
