On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, John Todd wrote: [snip]
> Additionally, if files are to be installed in /usr/local, then I'd > like to see the configs remain in /etc/asterisk since on my systems > (and many other people's) the /usr/ directories are for binaries > only; no configurations or "moving parts" so those directories can be > mounted read-only or mounted from a common server if necessary. I'm > sure this is what you meant, but I've seen config directories > unwisely located in /usr/local before, and I wanted to make sure > everyone is of the same mind where that is concerned. The existing FreeBSD port stores it's config files under /usr/local/etc which generally seems to be the 'done thing' (and I thought similarly on OpenBSD?) - you should be careful that you don't end up with confusion over this as I'd imagine using the port has been the main way people have gotten it working so far, perhaps a dialog with the maintainer would be useful so you're all singing from the same prayer book. My 2c Regards, Jess. -- Jess Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.burstfire.net/ _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
