Tilghman Lesher wrote: > On Wednesday 25 February 2009 09:51:23 Klaus Darilion wrote: >> Tilghman Lesher schrieb: >>> On Tuesday 24 February 2009 16:07:52 Klaus Darilion wrote: >>>> Barry L. Kline wrote: >>>>> that is supposed to gosub into the incoming extension at priority 1. >>>>> Versions before 1.6.0.6 would drop into the incoming,i,1 priority if >>>>> the requested extension wasn't present in the incoming context. >>>> Really strange that Goto and Gosub behave different. >>> If Goto behaves that way, that's a bug. As stated in a prior email, the >>> "i" extension should only be implicitly invoked when waiting for a new >>> extension and the typed extension does not match anything. >> FYI: If you take a look at the history of >> http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+i+extension you >> will find out that the old behavior is there since at least Nov. 2005, >> and probably used since then. > > voip-info.org is best known for being often wrong. >
I think the point being made was that a lot of people thought this was a feature, not a bug. I assume you're asserting the the dev's did not expect this behaviour, even if a large group of users did. That's OK. But there's still the question about why this behaviour is so bad/inconsistent/something that it should be changed. Simply labeling it a bug is just a conclusion. Why is it a bug??? sean _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
