Rich, What form of config is required in * to get >1 extensions available. Single login/registry or multiple? Do I have to specify lines per Christiasn's earlier mail?
Thanks, Michael On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 07:58:21 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: >Mike, > >The v2.03f code (alpha/beta?) did correct the multi-line problems very >nicely, however I think the snom folks might have another tweak or two >to make to this code. If your snom 200 is running in a business >production environment, you might want to wait a little. If you're using >it in a test/home/soho environment, it would appear the code is good >enough to play nicely in the multi-extn environment. Hint: after >upgrading to v2.03f, on the web interface goto Settings/Base and turn >off the option for "Challenge Response on Phone". > >I've not tested this extensively, but v2.03f appears to be very close >to what I'd consider a production release for basic sip/asterisk use >then any release that I've tested in the last several months. (Your >milage may vary!) > >In my limited testing, the code handled two extns well, nice Call Waiting >indication, call hold, alternating between extn 1 and 2 nicely, etc. >The only somewhat unusual operation that I noticed was: If the phone >as two calls going on (extn 1 and extn 2, one of which is on hold), >hanging up the phone causes the two extns to be bridged together without >any indication that happened on the phone itself (all LED's are off). >"That" could get to be embarrasing as it would suggest two inbound >calls from customers/friends/etc are now tied together without you >knowing it, and no way to recover from that accident. > >Rich >------------------------ >> Please forgive me if this is a silly question. I've been following this >> thread in the hope that I could put my * server and snom 200 into >> full-time service very soon. I need to find out how to have the lines >> configured so that it does not return a busy reply when only one call >> instances is engaged. >> >> Am I supposed to create multiple extensions on my asterisk dialplan to >> reflect the 5 call instances? That is, would the snom 200 be extension >> 2000 or 2000-2004? >> >> Also, did the 2.03f firmware resolve the matter? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Michael >> >> On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 16:05:39 +0100, Christian Stredicke wrote: >> >> >Hi Olle! >> > >> >I put something into trouble ticket (I guess you get this as email). >> > >> >BTW 2.03f is available at http://snom.com/download/share. >> > >> >Christian >> > >> >> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- >> >> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Olle E. Johansson >> >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Januar 2004 11:57 >> >> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Betreff: Re: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone? >> >> >> >> Christian Stredicke wrote: >> >> > We at snom have problems with Asterisk when we receive calls without the >> >> > line indication. When we register we place a contact like this: >> >> > >> >> > REGISTER sip:asterisk SIP/2.0 >> >> > Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];line=h35h345> >> >> > >> >> > When we receive the 200 Ok, we search for the "h35h345". If we don�t >> >> find >> >> > it, we try to guess which line is affected. This is relatively easy on a >> >> > REGISTER response, but on an incoming INVITE we have serious problems. I >> >> > think some of the challenging and line-assignment problems are related >> >> to >> >> > this problem. >> >> > >> >> > Strictly speaking, we register the contact >> >> > "sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];line=h35h345", NOT "sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"! >> >> Parameters >> >> > are an essential part of a URI which must not be discarded. >> >> Ok, Christian, let's fix this. >> >> >> >> First, I'm curious, is the "line=" parameter specified somewhere? (Always >> >> looking >> >> for documentation :-) >> >> >> >> Secondly, in many places in the sip channel, everything after the ";" is >> >> discarded. >> >> I would really appreciate if Snom could help us fixing this, so Snom >> >> phones work correctly >> >> and fully with Asterisk. (Have a new Snom 200 on my desk :-) >> >> >> >> I'm not an experienced C programmer, so I can't fix this myself. However, >> >> there are >> >> experienced C programmers in the community that will fix this, but they >> >> need proper >> >> and detailed input on what to fix. >> >> >> >> I've opened a bug >> >> http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000732 >> >> >> >> Let's continue adding information there. >> >> >> >> BTW, there's some other Snom problems where we need input from SNOM. >> >> Search on "Snom" >> >> in the bug tracker. Thank you for participating in the Asterisk community! >> >> >> >> /O >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Asterisk-Users mailing list >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> >Asterisk-Users mailing list >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >> >> -- >> Michael Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com >> Pixel Power Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> FWD 54245 >> >> "I am easily satisfied with the very best" - Winston Churchill >> >> "The questions arisen, is this a prison? Some say it is, but I say it >> isn't." >> - Ian Hunter >> >> ** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704 >> >> >> >> ===================END FORWARDED MESSAGE=================== >> >> -- >> Michael Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com >> Pixel Power Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> FWD 54245 >> >> "I know nothing, but I keep listening." - INXS >> >> ** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Asterisk-Users mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >---------------End of Original Message----------------- > > >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Michael Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com Pixel Power Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] FWD 54245 "The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer" - Henry Kissinger ** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704 _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
