Steve Totaro wrote: > Kind of like SwitchVox, FreePBX, Thirdlane......
I don't know that I'd make that comparison. I would say that in general, OpenSER is more low-level and amorphous and multipurpose than Asterisk or any GUI that wraps it. Asterisk has many applications and uses and niches, but these are all uses that capitalise on the "sort of thing" that Asterisk is. The genus of thing that it is on a technical level and the role it plays is fairly well-understood, even if there are many things you can do with that particular type of thing. OpenSER is hard to pin down like that. The closest you can come to it is to say that it is a proxy/UAS, and what does that really get you? It's used in situations that offer far less taxonomic resemblance to each other than sundry appropriations of Asterisk do. Yes, there's no argument that there are many things OpenSER does that can be driven by a GUI. But at the same time, that approach is somewhat antithetical to its basic nature. Its roles cannot be usefully anticipated nearly as well or as much. -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599 _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
