On Tuesday 26 August 2008 09:08:58 Gordon Henderson wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Tilghman Lesher wrote: > > On Tuesday 26 August 2008 06:49:54 Gordon Henderson wrote: > >> A-Ha... That string is 256 characters long... Now there's a fishy number > >> if ever there was one. > >> > >> So, if this a real limitation? This is 1.2.30 if that makes a > >> difference... > >> > >> Did this limit go away in 1.4 ? > > > > Yes, it did. > > OK. Thanks. > > Now I guess I have to play the 1.4 lottery :) > > (or will it get "fixed" in 1.2.31 ;-)
It will not get changed in 1.2 at all, sorry. That's a major architectural change, for a branch which has been end-of-lifed and is only eligible for security fixes, not new features. You could manually up the various buffers (there's more than one which affects this!) and recompile, if you were so inclined. 1.4 uses a completely different method of sizing the buffer, which allows for a seemingly limitless length of argments. One additional caveat, though: the buffer used for variable substitution is only 8k, so there's an additional limitation there, as well. -- Tilghman _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
