Better handling of the packets, that's for sure. Also, the algorithm is smart, and flexible... that being said, it opens more questions than answers.
CS -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Graves Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 5:24 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] MagicJack quality On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:13:15 -0400, C. Savinovich wrote: >I am puzzled by the quality of magicjack. I keep trying to figure out how >they can the quality be that adequate. Since Skype also has an excellent >quality, that leaves me to believe that software based calls (softphones) >could have and advantage over hardphones, provided there is a parameter that >those 2 companies are addressing. > >Anyone's thoughts on this? More memory & CPU power then the average hard phone? Michael -- Michael Graves mgraves<at>mstvp.com http://blog.mgraves.org o713-861-4005 c713-201-1262 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] skype mjgraves [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
