In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 01:45:09PM +0000, Tony Mountifield wrote: > > > > >/ Jerry, the first thing to check is "cat /proc/interrupts" and see if > > >there > > />/ is an entry for rtc on IRQ 8. There should be, and the interrupt counts > > />/ on there should be going up at approximately 1024 per second. > > / > > To see it better: > > > > watch -n1 -d cat /proc/interrupts > > > > > watch -n1 -d cat /proc/interrupts > Every 1.0s: cat > /proc/interrupts > > > Thu Apr 3 10:29:19 2008 > > CPU0 CPU1 > 0: 129 0 XT-PIC-XT timer > 1: 337248 0 XT-PIC-XT i8042 > 2: 0 0 XT-PIC-XT cascade > 3: 4 0 XT-PIC-XT > 4: 69 0 XT-PIC-XT > 5: 737837152 0 XT-PIC-XT HDA Intel > 7: 385 0 XT-PIC-XT parport0 > 8: 1 0 XT-PIC-XT rtc > > > It still remains as 1...
Hi Jerry, Is that with ztdummy loaded or not? By default, Linux doesn't have anything that uses the RTC interrupt, so without ztdummy it will usually stay at 1. Once ztdummy and zaptel are loaded, then you should see it incrementing. If not, that suggests a problem. I have just installed ztdummy on a new system running 2.6.18-53.1.6.el5, and it is incrementing fine. I didn't realise there was a newer kernel out; I'll have to update and try again. I didn't know the "watch" command - that's cool! Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
