----- Original Message ----- From: "Cees de Groot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 7:58 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: transfer with threeway calling
> Michiel Betel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >I agree with Cees, however, not wanting to throw away the 3 way > >conference feature, but giving the user a config choice might be best. > >Therefore I'm now testing a patch which will allow/disallow the 3 way > >conference. When disallowed it will fallback to "normal old fashioned" > >PBX behaviour namely FLASH puts caller on hold, FLASH again gets caller > >back. > > > Good. Choice is Good ;-) > > > -- > Cees de Groot http://www.tric.nl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > tric, the new way helpdesk/ticketing software, VoIP/CTI, > web applications, custom development > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Shouldn't this be an feature of the parking app? Something like: parkext =>700 parkhold =>701 700, Normal Park 701, Personal Park/EasyRetreive I transfer to 701. * says: "Next Available hold is 1" I dial 1. * parks caller and hangs up on me. I hang up. <time passes> I dial 701. * says: "Next Available hold is 2" (or * knows this isn't a transfer, and reads off the list of holds in use, possibly including callerid) I dial 1. * puts the call back together, or hangs up and rings that line back to me. Criticism and further discussion appreciated. No flames please, this is just an idea. ----- Andrew Thompson http://aktzero.com/ Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy. Notice how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
