On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 10:38:36AM -0500, Drew Gibson wrote: > > www.citel.com > > > > I used them a few years back in a pilot install with legacy Nortel > > phones and it worked well. I gather they have grown tremendously from > > there. I'm in North America, don't know how well they support UK stuff. > > Citel are, are they not, the company that specializes in "FXS" channel > banks specific to legacy digital phones? Do they do analog-POTS banks > as well? > > > Cheers, > -- jra > -- > Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > Designer The Things I Think RFC > 2100 > Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 > e24 > St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 > 1274 > > Those who cast the vote decide nothing. > Those who count the vote decide everything. > -- (Joseph Stalin)
Citel is the worst product I have ever dealt with, worse than Grandstream but for different reasons. Anyways, for smaller port density I love the Quintum Tenor AX 24 port FXS, They may make a 48, I am not sure. This is a SIP connection, and there are probably a multitude of other products that do the same, Quintum blew me away with the sheer amount of options and configuration (that you will probably never use). I have heard people suggest MaxTNT for high port densities, which looks great, I just have no experience or need for such a device yet. The other option is a channel bank that connects via T1 or I guess E1 (although I have never seen an E1 30 port channel bank, I am in the US so it is not surprising) Thanks, Steve Totaro _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
