Moises Silva wrote: >>> Asterisk 1.6 includes a new feature that allows using AMI as a transport >>> for AGI commands, there abstraction becomes even more important. >>> For Asterisk-Java I am currently adding support for that in a way that >>> allows the developer to run the same "AGI" code either through FastAGI >>> or AMI without knowing about the underlying details. >> Where is more information on this new feature for Asterisk 1.6? Any details? > > I wrote this blog entry when I was writing the AsyncAGI feature: > http://www.moythreads.com/wordpress/2007/12/24/asterisk-asynchronous-agi/ > > This is the bug entry: http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11282 > > I changed my mind regarding the behavior of this feature after opening > the bug entry, so the initial description of the bug can be confusing > and totally different from the final implementation and behavior, so > you will have to read all the comments in the bug entry to understand > what is this about. > > Moisés Silva >
Thanks. That's pretty slick. It could add some flexibility, but as you noted on your blog, you could just as easily redirect to a FastAGI server, etc. Being able to call AGI's on a channel through the AMI seems like it could have some possibilities as well. -- Warm Regards, Lee "Everything I needed to learn in life, I learned selling encyclopedias door to door." _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
