On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:48:43 +0100, Nicolas Bougues wrote
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:28:27AM +0100, Florian Overkamp wrote:
> >
> > Registration cascading is not possible (I think) but could it be
solved
> > with a shared dial route:
> >
> > Instead of DIAL(IAX/sip.isp.com) could you not
> > DIAL(IAX/sip1.isp.com&IAX/sip2.isp.com&IAX/sip3.isp.com) to reach
a similar
> > effect ? (or chain them in different lines so it tries to reach
the first
> > one, then the second one if it fails, and the third if that fails.
> >
> > Florian
> >
>
> This could solve the problem in the short term, but is not really
> "elegant". Each time I add a server I'd have to modify quite
> a lot of extensions.conf on each server.
>
hmm how about define
MYSERVERS=IAX/sip1.isp.com&IAX/sip2.isp.com&IAX/sip3.isp.com and use
${MYSERVERS} wherever appropriate? only one change required then
> I'm not quite familiar with IAX(2) and registration
> questions. Does anybody sees any tricky problem that could
> arise with some kind of auto-cascading registrations through
> IAX (that is, any registration, SIP, IAX... would be
> forwarded on an IAX channel) ?
>
> --
> Nicolas Bougues
> Axialys Interactive
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
