Lacy's response in the thread 'Why does everyone seem to dislike *now?', has a small bit that caught my eye.
Chan_Skinny made a lot of progress between 1.2 and 1.4, and even more in the later 1.4.X releases. I am curious as to which features/functions that chan_skinny might be lacking compared to chan_sccp. We (the community) now have a small, but active, group of volunteers working on the chan_skinny code. I'm not interested in re-igniting the flame-wars of the past about these channel drivers, but I would like to know what else needs to be addressed in chan_skinny before it users of chan_sccp would consider using it. Thanks, Dan _______________________________________________ Sign up now for AstriCon 2007! September 25-28th. http://www.astricon.net/ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
