Murf, you crack me up, but I totally agree with the vote or don't complain model.
Thanks, Dave On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 13:05 -0600, Steve Murphy wrote: > I have created an asterisk.org blog entry: > > http://www.asterisk.org/node/48358 > > to describe what I will shortly be committing to trunk to correct the > weaknesses of CDRs, that asterisk users and developers have been > complaining about for quite some time. > > Highlights: Restructuring the code and philosophy of CDRs. > Plans to eliminate the ForkCDR() application > Plans to create the CDRstart(), > CDRanswer(handle), > and CDRclose(handle) functions to provide > dialplan ability to create CDR records. > > (I am considering restructuring the CDR function, also, > to allow mods to be made to not only Channel-attached > CDR's, > but also the fields in CDRs created by CDRstart(), BTW). > > I seek feedback from folks who have battled with CDRs to develop billing > applications, and those who plan doing so in the future. Participate or > be happy with the senseless mess that will surely result from your > non-participation! > > murf > > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-dev mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
