You guys all sound like you're talking about AstManProxy. See: http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=AstManProxy
I'm not saying it is the solution to your problem per se, but I can't help but think of it when I read the descriptions of what people want (you even use the word proxy!). Figured I'd send this out in case someone hadn't seen it. Martin Smith, Systems Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bureau of Economic and Business Research University of Florida (352) 392-0171 Ext. 221 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Lee Jenkins > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk manager interface stability > > > The new Asterisk Manager web API in 1.4 is a good step > where sending of > > Actions does not require an actual Telnet conneciton to the > AMI, but I > > think to be able to handle larger numbers of concurrent > connections that > > a separate send-only and a separate receive-only type of > interface be > > built where Asterisk would just output all AMI data to a single > > server-like application that would then broadcast it to all > connected > > clients. This would remove the burden of so many connections going > > directly into Asterisk and would allow for much larger scaling of > > AMI-type applications that require real-time output of AMI events. > > > > I definitely agree here personally. Clients could connect to this > "proxy" and subscribe to only the events that are interesting > or applicable. > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
