Justin Newman wrote:
We have considered working on this. T38 is a short term solution, though.
Justin Newman
Why would it be interesting to you to implement T.38? It seems you are
also someone who doesn't disclaim code and get it into SVN.
Steve
------------------------------
From: Tomislav Par?ina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk Faxing Support
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
Asterisk 1.2 has no support of t.38 whatsoever, the call will drop
before t.38 is ever utilised, not even pass-thru.
1.4 Adds support for T.38 pass through only and no other sort of
faxing, the endpoint must support T.38 and you must send your call to
a T.38 gateway and you must not use NAT anywhere in your network and
you must enable re-invites which could cause CDRs not to reflect the
true details of the call.
Asterisk/Digium also has no interest in any further interest in
expanding T.38 or faxing support in Asterisk.
Steve Underwood and the other fine persons that have helped to develop
the software DSPs and other stuff required for FoIP support also have
no interest in writing any further faxing support for Asterisk (RxFax,
TxFax + the newest span_dsp wont even compile, much less work under
Asterisk any more) probably because they know it will never be
included into the Asterisk code.
Someone please tell me this isn't truth.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
