I have a request into their operations @ the FTC asking for developer access to write a module based on their data. We'll see...
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dean Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 9:18 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Do Not Call List > > Thanks for looking into this further Kevin. > I guess this knocks a 'formal' asterisk asp sharing agreement on the head. > > I can understand why they have done this but also sucks for people > installing asterisk using this. > > At least the formal data sets are documented so a module for lookup prior > to calling can be checked against. > > I haven't checked as this isn't my space but I guess anyone offering > predictive dialers to asterisk is already building this into their product > offerings (or coding as we speak). > > > Cheers, > > Dean > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- <mailto:asterisk-users-> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bockman > > Sent: Sunday, 19 November 2006 12:12 PM > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Do Not Call List > > > > Keep reading. The person that actually does the calling needs to be > > registered. You can't provide the list to others either. > > > > > > Kevin > > > > Don Fanning wrote: > > > Oddly enough, there's really nothing stopping one from doing so in the > > > material I just scan through at: > > > http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/rulemaking/tsr/tsrrulemaking/index.htm <http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/rulemaking/tsr/tsrrulemaking/index.htm> > > > <http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/rulemaking/tsr/tsrrulemaking/index.htm <http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/rulemaking/tsr/tsrrulemaking/index.htm> > > > > > > > > > > In regards to the fee, here is the latest: > > > ---- > > >> The amended rule increases the annual fee for access to the Registry > > for > > >> each area code of data to $62 per area code, or $31 per area code of > > data > > >> during the second six months of an entity's annual subscription > period. > > The > > >> maximum amount that would be charged to any single entity for > accessing > > 280 > > >> area codes of data or more is increased to $17,050. In addition, the > > >> amended rule retains the provisions regarding free access by "exempt" > > >> organizations, as well as free access to the first five area codes of > > data > > >> by all entities. > > > ---- > > > > > > In particular, here is the part on the usage... If a central database > > > (external from the FTC) does start up, they'll have to register who > uses > > the > > > database. > > > > > > --- > > > ยง 310.9 Fee for access to do-not-call > > > registry. > > > (c) Access to the do-not-call registry is > > > limited to telemarketers working on their > > > own behalf or working on behalf > > > of other sellers or telemarketers. Prior to > > > accessing the do-not-call registry, a > > > telemarketer must provide the > > > identifying information required by the > > > operator of the registry to collect the > > > user fee, and must certify, under penalty > > > of law, that the telemarketer is accessing > > > the registry solely to comply with the > > > provisions of this rule. If the > > > telemarketer is accessing the registry on > > > behalf of other sellers or telemarketers, > > > that telemarketer also must identify > > > each of the other sellers or telemarketers > > > on whose behalf it is accessing the > > > registry, and it must certify, under > > > penalty of law, that the other sellers or > > > telemarketers will be using the > > > information gathered from the registry > > > solely to comply with the provisions of > > > this rule. > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Dean Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > ] > > >> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 3:45 PM > > >> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > >> Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Do Not Call List > > >> > > >> I'm surprised someone doesn't come up with a consortium for all the > > >> asterisk users to poll a central location or does the data come with > > >> restrictions about sharing the data? > > >> > > >> Duane from e164.org says he's already built the application you are > > >> looking for to deal with Australian databases if that helps. > > >> > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> > > >> Dean > > _______________________________________________ > > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > > > asterisk-users mailing list > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users <http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users> > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users <http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users> _____ << ella for Spam Control >> has removed 3979 Spam messages and set aside 119 Newsletters for me You can use it too - and it's FREE! www.ellaforspam.com <http://www.ellaforspam.com> _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
