Matt Florell wrote:
Yes, that is very confusing :)
Is there no way to throw a timer chip in there(I suppose it's way too
late to put that suggestion forward now)?
Curiosity, isn't the timer from the 2.6 kernel 'good enough' for
Asterisk purposes nowadays ?
Or there is a constraint using 2.6+ztdummy that is not obvious (to me at
least :-)) ?
There are many instalations that need a zaptel timer to use meetme
with no telco lines and this will be the first Digium zaptel card made
that does not provide such a timer.
Even if it was just a fake X100P-type single FXO channel that is not
used, it would still be a wonderful addition(and relatively cheap) to
fully utilize Asterisk with only VOIP channels. Otherwise there are a
lot of installations that will still have to have that extra X100P
card in their machines.
Thanks,
MATT---
On 7/31/06, Kevin P. Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
----- Matt Florell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will this card serve as a zaptel timer?
>
> It's kind of hard to imagine that it wouldn't, I just want to make
> sure since this is the first Digium card with no telco interfaces.
No, the transcoder card is not a Zaptel interface, so it does not
provide any 'spans', and thus cannot provide timing. The interface to
it is part of Zaptel, though, just to keep everyone confused :-)
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
