Why? It seems clear to me that if the person dialed through Zap/2 does not
answer, that he does not want to answer the ringing line...
I think there may be a gotcha here for analogue zaptel interfaces, wherein the
ring will keep getting detected an keep (re)trying to dial, but having to
answer the zap line before doing anything with it (especially routing) is NOT
what I would consider standard operating procedure.
I don't Answer() any other calls (even Zap calls off a PRI), but I've
run into problems when I don't Answer() analog POTS lines using zap.
I've seen issues (particularly audio, but other issues, too) where
asterisk moves on to the subsequent priorities before the zap call is
fully bridged. As a result, I've made it a policy to always answer an
analog zap line before doing anything with it. If the party dialed on
Zap/2 does not answer, there's not much difference for the calling
party. They'll still hear ringback.
- Noah
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
