> Is anybody on this list actually using iax2 for > anything mission-critical?
Yes. 2K inbound / outbound calls a day to 30 remote locations, aggregated to 2 PRI's tied together with IAX2. All with IP address specified rather than hostname. All with Asterisk 1.0.9. All with 99.9% completion rate, and it would be 99.999% if we weren't using consumer grade DOCSIS cable modems in the remote locations.It is quite possible to make a nice Asterisk install if you are conservative in your approach, and upgrading to CVS-HEAD (or whatever it's called these days) every night is *not* the way to do it (I'm sure you aren't doing that, but my point is that with bleeding edge, you, well, bleed.) It spooks me to think of how insanely great Asterisk will be in 2 years once the dev team is through this 1.2 - 1.3 - 1.4 - 1.X period and we can get our hands on a stable, bugfixed, and mature 2.0 release. Until then, 1.0.9 is for me. go devs go! _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
