My main concerns would be, can you have multiple cards like this on a system, for example, I now have a te110p and 2 tdm04b and Im getting irqmisses on the te110p (according to zttool and zttest) which makes fax receiving on the te110p almost impossible.. Plus, voice is getting frame slips.
I was hoping sangoma cards could be more "enterprise" friendly. |-----Original Message----- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of |John Novack |Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 4:57 PM |To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion |Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Performance: Xeon or Opteron? | |Have a 2FXO 2FXS card working now. |More forgiving of the PCI bus. The software installation is a |little mean, with the outlined procedure making assumptions |about the installers knowledge and familiarity with Sangoma |products, and in some places it doesn't really discriminate |between their T1 and A200 cards. |I found one defect in their FXS driver, which they have now fixed. | |Overall seems to be a good product, slightly more affordable |and less of a problem child than the Digium/TigerJet TDM400 | |John Novack | |Anton Krall wrote: | |>Has anybody used the sangoma fxo cards with asterisk? Anybody using |>multiple cards? Problems with irq and such (same as with digium ones)? |> |> |> |>|-----Original Message----- |>|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |>|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John |>|Novack |>|Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 10:29 AM |>|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |>|Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion |>|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Performance: Xeon or Opteron? |>| |>| |>| |>|Rich Adamson wrote: |>| |>|> |>|> While talking with one of the sangoma folks very recently, he was |>|> rather emphatic the pci bus was designed to "share" |>|interrupts. I was |>|> a little concerned as a test server had the wanpipe driver |>|sharing an |>|> interrupt with libata and uhc1_hcd. His comment was |"that's the way |>|> its suppose to work, sharing interrupts as needed". I've |not had any |>|> recognizable issues with the A200D card at all, and faxing |>|via a A200D |>|> fxs port to a A200D fxo (pstn) port functions 100% reliably. |>|> |>|> What that would suggest is the TDM400 pci firmware |(whether on card |>|> logic or whatever) is the source of at least part of the |>|TDM400 shared |>|> interrupt issue. I don't have any digium T1/E1 cards |laying around, |>|> but if memory serves correctly, the T1/E1 cards do not use |the same |>|> pci controller chip. That would suggest the T1/E1 cards are |>|less of an |>|> issue then with the TDM400 card. |>| |>|That's good to know, but considering the response from Digium on the |>|TDM400 ( try another motherboard) when there didn't seem to |even be an |>|int. sharing issue, the card just couldn't be seen at all , and the |>|support I received from Sangoma on a recent FXS issue that was |>|resolved within a few days, I would tend to go with Sangoma |for the T1 |>|card, if and when I have the need. |>| |>|John Novack |>| |>|_______________________________________________ |>|--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- |>| |>|Asterisk-Users mailing list |>|To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: |>| http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users |>| |>| |> |>_______________________________________________ |>--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- |> |>Asterisk-Users mailing list |>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: |> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users |> |> |> |> |_______________________________________________ |--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- | |Asterisk-Users mailing list |To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: | http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users | _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
