[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am proposing an Asterisk system of many servers to service multiple > departments in a number of locatations to a large client. They have an > IT department but their Linux skills are weak and they are likely to > face a high churn rate in staff so it would not be wise to expect a > high level of Linux expertise to be maintained. I am thinking it > would be best to do the nitty gritty glue work at the config file > level myself but have a web based interface to common tasks such as > managing extensions, adding trucks, voicemail etc. They are anxious > for obvious reasons that they are able to manage the system without > having to call me every time they need changes. > As it will be a multi-server system there will be some fairly detailed > configs to put together, so I would think a [EMAIL PROTECTED] installation > would not be suitable, but I haven't tested that theory so I am not > against trying it. What recommendations for web management can you > make from experience of larger systems? It doesn't have to be limited > to free systems. > I am also interested in opinions on whether you would implement one > monster server to do everything and have parts to maintain it, or > would your preference be to have one server per department and > interlink them, keeping the hardware the same and having a standby > system ready to fill in for failed systems. On one hand there is only > one server to monitor, on the other there is redundancy but also > complexity. I can see advantages in both approaches.
Chris, PBXware comes as standard with the features your client requires: http://www.bicomsystems.com/popup/319/C/features/P_2571/#a1597 If you need more info please contact me! Senad _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
